long live the yahoo group

the yahoo group is dead. i deleted it yesterday, in case you were wondering. obviously it was a failed experiment in social engineering. i concede.

Virtual Refrigerator

Check out this new blog: http://virtual-refrigerator.blogspot.com/.

Danish men very porductive

Nine out of ten Danish men surf for porn on the job

Expert: It makes them more productive

A Danish study shows that over 90 percent of Danish men surf for porn on their work computers.
“Men clear their heads by looking at a threesome for example,” the Danish sexologist Joan Ørting told Ekstrabladet.
The Danish computer company Ibas takes in many work computers for service and repairs. And the hard drives tell their secret stories.
“We find pornographic pictures and movies on between 90 and 95 percent of the computers that belong to men,” Ibas Vice President Henrik Andersen told Ekstrabladet.
The corresponding statistic for women is 5 percent.
That’s not very strange according to the sexologist Joan Ørting.
“It’s a matter of relaxation and reward. Men reward themselves with naked women and threesomes, while women take a cigarette break and chat a little with their coworkers,” says Joan Ørting.
She also says that men are more productive when they surf for porn.
“After a few minutes of looking at porn, they are alert again and dig into their work,” she tells Ekstrabladet.
But Flemming Dreesen of the Confederation of Danish Employers doesn’t feel as positive about it.
“The number of men who look at porn is incredibly high, and it’s not something one should do on their work time. Employers should not pay for this type of time wasting,” he tells Ekstrabladet.

Anna Lindström
Aftonbladet
5/16/2006

Oh say

Eric has a good discussion of the Star Spangled Banner flap over at There’s a pattern here to see. Go read it and maybe make a comment.

I was struck by Bush’s statement “I think people who want to be a citizen of this country ought to learn English, and they ought to learn to sing the National Anthem in English.” Learning English, like in the discussion of Official English, seems to be the heart of the matter. It’s odd though that the issue is always framed as something THEY have to do: “immigrants ought to learn English.” It’s never discussed as something WE need to do: “We ought to teach immigrants English.” The assumption is of course that the opportunities are there and it’s a failure by the immigrants to take advantage of those opportunities. It’s not a failure to provide opportunities on our part.

I tend to relate to this issue through the lens of my own pseudo-immigrant experience: when I was 17 I went to Sweden for 9 months as an exchange student. I lived with a nice family in an upscale suburb of Gothenburg and went to Hvitfeldska gymnasiet (at the time a quiet school, but later the scene of anti-globalization riots). After about 4 months in the country I was speaking pretty fluent Swedish. And I still speak it 20 some years later. I’m pretty sure this wasn’t the case with all of the Americans who went over that year. So why was I special?

It could be that I’m just good at languages—I did, after all, become a linguist later. I’m not too convinced by that. I took German and French in school and I’m pretty sure none of it stuck. Instead, I think there are two major reasons; I wanted to speak Swedish and I had the opportunity to speak it all the time. For example, the family I stayed with didn’t speak English with me even much though some of them could have. And my classmates didn’t speak English with me either, mostly because they were embarrassed I think. What I take from that is that learning a language is a social task. You can’t just sit and read grammar books or listen to tapes. You have to talk to people. And you have to do it a lot.

So if Bush and people like him are serious about immigrants learning English, they need to recognize this. They need to see that immigrants spend time with English-speaking Americans beyond mowing their lawns, pumping their gas, or cleaning their offices.

i hope she's right

"Anger at the incompetent and arrogant pResident is going to bring the GOP to their knees in a crushing defeat in this year's midterm election. "[A] solid majority of residents in states that President Bush carried in 2004 now disapprove of the job he is doing as president." "

http://guerillawomentn.blogspot.com/2006/04/anger-at-bush-spells-defeat-for-gop.html

What I did in grad school

Last week I picked up Innumeracy by John Allen Paulos. It’s an old one, but a good one. In it, he talks a little about how mathematicians are partially to blame for innumeracy.

“It is almost always possible to present an intellectually honest and engaging account of any field, using a minimal of technical apparatus. This is seldom done, however, since most priesthoods (mathematicians included) are inclined to hide behind a wall of mystery and to commune only with their fellow priests.”

I don’t think jargon is necessarily a way to hide away from the outside world. It’s got a lot of uses, but not recognizing that it exists is a barrier to communication with non-initiates. Personally, though, I just find it very hard to explain things I know very well to people and part of the problem is thinking you need to start at the very beginning.

Now that I’m out of academics, I spend a great deal of time with normal people. When someone asks me what I wrote my dissertation on, I usually just mumble something about long consonants in the world’s languages and look embarrassed. I feel like without explaining the general assumptions of generative grammar and then how phonology fits in there and then how Optimality Theory works not to mention the representation of segmental length (moraic theory), my dissertation makes no sense. A lot of the advice I’ve seen on research say that the core idea of your research should be explainable to non-technical audience. I’ve never been able to get a hang of this skill.

Maybe I’m just slow, because lately I think I know what to say. Here’s my attempt.

There is good evidence that the brain uses very economical representations to store information about sounds in language. For example, in languages that have them, long consonants are basically twice as long as short ones—when someone says a word with a long consonant they hold the consonant twice as long as they would a short one. So, there are two possible ways the brain could represent them. They could be two short consonants put together or they one consonant that is marked “long.”

Suppose you use the symbol t to represent a short t sound. Then a long t sound could be made by two t’s in a row (tt) or one t that is somehow marked as being “long” (like t:).

All of the data from languages point to t: being the right representation. That is, human brains say, “don’t use two symbols to represent a sound when you can use one.”

How do we state this generalization in our model of how linguistics knowledge is stored in our brains? Some models just flat-out say, “don’t use two symbols when you can use one.” My dissertation showed that every component of the model has to be constructed so that none of them prefer two symbols to one. Which ends up being quite tricky. And we have to wonder if this is just a property of consonants.

I’d appreciate it if you could let me know if this is understandable or not. And if you want to read the gory details you can go here.

NJ assemblyman reintroduces English bill

On January 10th, assemblyman John Rooney introduced another bill into the NJ State Assembly to make English the official language of the state. That’s all the bill says. I don’t know what it means. It may mean English, like the eastern goldfinch, the violet, the honey bee, the horse, the Hadrosaurus Foulkii, the brook trout, the shell of the knobbed whelk, the schooner A.J. Meerwalk, and the highbush blueberry, is simply officially designated by the government as being representative of New Jersey. I assume though that it means something more.

A bill like this has regularly been introduced every two years since at least 1996. They never go anywhere. So hopefully this one won’t either. Still, in 1999, Clifton, NJ adopted an English-only policy. It has apparently been repealed, but at the time the Bergen Record reported:

Anzaldi's sentiment is shared by state Assembly members Marion Crecco (R-Essex)and John Rooney (R-Bergen),who have long proposed legislation making English the official language of New Jersey. The state officials feel English provides a
cultural tie that binds diverse groups together.

''If you don't understand English, you are not going to succeed in the U.S.," said Rooney, who, like many English-only proponents, also takes issue with bilingual education. "People say I'm being prejudiced. I'm not being prejudiced. I'm trying to give them an opportunity."

I can see that attitude taking hold here.

For example, I live in Hawthorne, just across the mighty Passaic river from Paterson. The area that includes Hawthorne had been part of Paterson at one time, but Hawthorne separated from Paterson in 1898. Still the US Postal Service gives Paterson as an “acceptable city name” in the zip codes for Hawthorne: 07506 and 07507.

Paterson was once a thriving city. It was a center of textile manufacturing and the movie industry—Abbott and Costello filmed there, among others. It is the home of both William Carlos Williams, who wrote many poems about the city including an epic, and Allen Ginsburg.

Like most New Jersey cities*, Paterson is in decline. According to the 2000 census, the population is about 150,000 today. And it’s losing people (down about 6% from 1990s). About 22% of the residents live under the poverty level.

It’s also racially diverse. About 50% of the residents are Hispanic and 33% African American and 31% White. (These numbers include people who self-identify with more than one race so they don’t add up to 100%.). Also 33% are foreign-born and 56% speak a language other than English at home.

Before the white flight beginning in the 50s, Paterson had a large Italian population. Now many of them live in Hawthorne and view Paterson warily. Apparently, the river between Hawthorne and Paterson is not enough, the local weekly newspaper, the Hawthorne Press, had this in their editorial last week (March 9, 2006):

Another federal bureaucracy—the US Postal Service—already considers us part of Paterson. Hawthorne’s two zip codes—07506 and 07507—often come up “Paterson, New Jersey” in our magazine subscriptions and on national address software programs.
It’s annoying and a recent postcard to borough residents was the final insult.

Addressed to “postal customer,” it was an announcement about an
upcoming passport fair at Paterson’s Ward Street office. It would have been
welcome news except that it’s predominant language was Spanish. The English
translation was in much smaller type, intended to be a secondary
language.

Instead of a positive public information campaign, (solicita tu pasaporte en este evento del servicio postal™ cerca de ti) it turned out to be a public relations disaster to those of us who consider English our country’s official language.

I got this post card and threw it out without a thought. I have a hard time understanding why this is a “public relations disaster.”

*I have a theory that New Jersey cities suffer more because of their closeness to New York. New York is like a cultural black hole, any middle class who might be interested in an urban lifestyle would much rather be in New York than a city in New Jersey.