Virtual Refrigerator

Check out this new blog: http://virtual-refrigerator.blogspot.com/.

Danish men very porductive

Nine out of ten Danish men surf for porn on the job

Expert: It makes them more productive

A Danish study shows that over 90 percent of Danish men surf for porn on their work computers.
“Men clear their heads by looking at a threesome for example,” the Danish sexologist Joan Ørting told Ekstrabladet.
The Danish computer company Ibas takes in many work computers for service and repairs. And the hard drives tell their secret stories.
“We find pornographic pictures and movies on between 90 and 95 percent of the computers that belong to men,” Ibas Vice President Henrik Andersen told Ekstrabladet.
The corresponding statistic for women is 5 percent.
That’s not very strange according to the sexologist Joan Ørting.
“It’s a matter of relaxation and reward. Men reward themselves with naked women and threesomes, while women take a cigarette break and chat a little with their coworkers,” says Joan Ørting.
She also says that men are more productive when they surf for porn.
“After a few minutes of looking at porn, they are alert again and dig into their work,” she tells Ekstrabladet.
But Flemming Dreesen of the Confederation of Danish Employers doesn’t feel as positive about it.
“The number of men who look at porn is incredibly high, and it’s not something one should do on their work time. Employers should not pay for this type of time wasting,” he tells Ekstrabladet.

Anna Lindström
Aftonbladet
5/16/2006

Oh say

Eric has a good discussion of the Star Spangled Banner flap over at There’s a pattern here to see. Go read it and maybe make a comment.

I was struck by Bush’s statement “I think people who want to be a citizen of this country ought to learn English, and they ought to learn to sing the National Anthem in English.” Learning English, like in the discussion of Official English, seems to be the heart of the matter. It’s odd though that the issue is always framed as something THEY have to do: “immigrants ought to learn English.” It’s never discussed as something WE need to do: “We ought to teach immigrants English.” The assumption is of course that the opportunities are there and it’s a failure by the immigrants to take advantage of those opportunities. It’s not a failure to provide opportunities on our part.

I tend to relate to this issue through the lens of my own pseudo-immigrant experience: when I was 17 I went to Sweden for 9 months as an exchange student. I lived with a nice family in an upscale suburb of Gothenburg and went to Hvitfeldska gymnasiet (at the time a quiet school, but later the scene of anti-globalization riots). After about 4 months in the country I was speaking pretty fluent Swedish. And I still speak it 20 some years later. I’m pretty sure this wasn’t the case with all of the Americans who went over that year. So why was I special?

It could be that I’m just good at languages—I did, after all, become a linguist later. I’m not too convinced by that. I took German and French in school and I’m pretty sure none of it stuck. Instead, I think there are two major reasons; I wanted to speak Swedish and I had the opportunity to speak it all the time. For example, the family I stayed with didn’t speak English with me even much though some of them could have. And my classmates didn’t speak English with me either, mostly because they were embarrassed I think. What I take from that is that learning a language is a social task. You can’t just sit and read grammar books or listen to tapes. You have to talk to people. And you have to do it a lot.

So if Bush and people like him are serious about immigrants learning English, they need to recognize this. They need to see that immigrants spend time with English-speaking Americans beyond mowing their lawns, pumping their gas, or cleaning their offices.